Michael Rawson, co-founder of the Public Interest Law Project in Oakland, advocates for affordable housing and public benefits. He considers the Yu case more likely to end up in settlement than a grinding, years-long crusade through high courts. But “anytime inclusionary zoning laws get attacked there’s a possibility the decision will end up at SCOTUS,” Rawson says. “That’s certainly one way this could turn out.”

Read the full article by Adam Brinklow in the Frisc here.