Judge Denies San Luis Obispo’s Motion to Dismiss Case Brought by Unhoused Residents

Judge Denies San Luis Obispo’s Motion to Dismiss Case Brought by Unhoused Residents


Federal Judge Cormac J. Carney resoundingly rejected the City of San Luis Obispo’s motion to dismiss, allowing a case brought by unhoused residents and Hope’s Village SLO to move forward.

Five unhoused and low-income Plaintiffs, along with Hope’s Village SLO, filed the lawsuit challenging the City’s pervasive and consistent practice of citing, fining, arresting, and moving unhoused people to different locations in the absence of adequate and available shelter. They also allege that the City takes and destroys the personal belongings of unhoused persons, including tents, tarps, blankets, and life-saving medication.

“I hope that this will result in good things happening and more awareness of homelessness issues in the City, and more understanding that what has been happening has been wrong and things have to change.” - Plaintiff Edward Marquez.

The City’s behavior has been particularly cruel during the pandemic, as the constant moving of people contributes to heightened risk of the spread of COVID-19.

”We hope that this ruling causes the City to rethink fighting Plaintiffs’ well-founded claims, and instead come to the table to find real solutions to the homelessness crisis in San Luis Obispo.” - Lauren Hansen, Staff Attorney at PILP

Instead of trying to resolve Plaintiffs’ claims, the City expended wasteful resources trying to fight the case, filing a motion to dismiss, asking the Court to dismiss all of the Plaintiff’s claims, and alleging that Hope’s Village did not have standing to bring a lawsuit. However, on February 7, 2022, Judge Carney denied the motion in its entirety, allowing the Plaintiffs’ case to move forward and requiring the City to file an answer to their Complaint. With respect to the lawsuit’s claim that the City’s practice of punishing people for living outdoors when adequate shelter is unavailable violates the 8th Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment, the court stated: “[The City] may not, consistent with the Eighth Amendment, criminalize resting outside on public property when there is insufficient sleeping space practically available in any shelter” and that “Plaintiffs plausibly allege that [the City] has done so.”

“We believe this is a positive ruling. We are excited to continue to move forward in litigation and fight for the rights of our clients and the unhoused community in SLO.” - Frank Kopcinski, Directing Attorney of CRLA-SLO

After hearing about the ruling, Becky Jorgensen, the Director of Hope’s Village SLO, a local nonprofit organization that provides services to individuals experiencing homelessness said:

“We have tried for 10 years to get more help for our homeless people who have little or no income or chance of getting housing. We have tried to persuade the City to follow the law. Someone has to break the chain. Let it be us.”


Read more about this case here.

Press Coverage:
San Luis Obispo Tribune, "Judge denies SLO’s motion to dismiss houseless lawsuit. Here’s why"

Read the ruling here.
Read the press release.